SFeDu
of.211, Gorgoko St., 88 
Rostov-on-Don
Russia
344002
+7 (863) 250-59-54
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
te@sfedu.ru

TERRA ECONOMICUS

Rules of the digital game: How institutions shape ecosystem development


TERRA ECONOMICUS, Vol. 23, No 3,

Citation: Campos-Medina F., Korneeva E., Krayneva R., Gorina L. (2025). Rules of the digital game: How institutions shape ecosystem development. Terra Economicus 23(3), 131–144. DOI: 10.18522/2073-66062025-23-3-131-144

Acknowledgment:

This paper explores institutional factors influencing the development of digital economy ecosystems, emphasizing the roles of regulatory frameworks, governance, and innovation. The paper uses institutional economics as a theoretical foundation and highlights how institutional arrangements shape digital infrastructure investment, digital adoption, and innovation capabilities among enterprises. This empirical research is based on unique data extracted from a sample of online survey questionnaires collected from 250 small and medium-sized enterprises in seven different Russian regions between January and March 2025, as well as an econometric model that uses this data. Our analysis demonstrates that institutional quality significantly influences digital adoption, along with investments in digital infrastructure and innovation outcomes through a proposed empirical framework and the regression modelling. The main outcomes of this work offer the extensive policy implications for enhancing institutional quality to foster sustainable digital economy ecosystems. As future research directions, we propose particularly longitudinal studies to assess the dynamic interactions over time. Our findings might be of a special importance for the relevant stakeholders and policymakers as well as for the entrepreneurs who are keen on participating and creating robust and sustainable digital economy ecosystems.

Keywords: digital economy; sustainable economic development; institutional economics; Russia
JEL codes: B25, B52, D83, L86


References:
  • Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. N.Y.: Crown Publishers.
  • Afolabi, J. (2023). Advancing digital economy in Africa: The role of critical enablers. Technology in Society 75, 102367. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102367
  • Andrès, E., Reichert, S., Brandt, C., Hill, N., Gass, R. (2016). Development and experimentation of a new digital communicating and intelligent stethoscope. European Research in Telemedicine / La Recherche Européenne en Télémédecine 5(4), 145–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurtel.2016.09.003
  • Bannykh, G., Kostina, S. (2022). The state’s activity on the development of digital capitalism: Evidence from Russia. Post-Communist Economies 34(1), 99–121. DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2020.1867446
  • Cirillo, V., Fanti, L., Mina, A., Ricci, A. (2023). The adoption of digital technologies: Investment, skills, work organisation. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 66, 89–105. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2023.04.011
  • Cole, D. (2017). Laws, norms, and the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Journal of Institutional Economics 13(4), 829–847. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137417000030
  • David, L., Wang, J., Brooks, W., Angel, V. (2025). Digital transformation and socio-economic development in emerging economies: A multinational analysis. Technology in Society 81, 102834. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102834
  • Deng, Z., Liesch, P., Wang, Z. (2021). Deceptive signaling on globalized digital platforms: Institutional hypnosis and firm internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies 52(6), 1096–1120. DOI: 10.1057/s41267-021-00401-w
  • Dow, G. (2022). The labor-managed firm, Oliver Williamson, and me. Journal of Institutional Economics 18(2), 219–236. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137421000448
  • Frolov, D. (2021). Blockchain and institutional complexity: An extended institutional approach. Journal of Institutional Economics 17(1), 21–36. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137420000272
  • Gamidullaeva, L., Vasin, S., Wise, N. (2020). Increasing small- and medium-enterprise contribution to local and regional economic growth by assessing the institutional environment. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 27(2), 259–280. DOI: 10.1108/JSBED-07-2019-0219
  • Ha, L., To, T., Thi Thanh Huyen, N., Hoa, H., Ngoc, T. (2024). The roles of e-government in combating corruption: evidence from European countries. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 15(6), 1505–1533. DOI: 10.1108/JSTPM-04-2022-0065
  • Han, Z., Wood, S., Coe, N., Alexander, A. (2024). Conceptualising the co-evolution of China’s industrial and institutional environment for cross-border e-commerce. Geoforum 153, 104034. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104034
  • He, Y. (2024). Chinese digital platform companies’ expansion in the Belt and Road countries. The Information Society 40(2), 96–119. DOI: 10.1080/01972243.2024.2317058
  • Hodgson, G. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues 40(1), 1–25. DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879
  • Hodgson, G. (2025). Formal and informal institutions: some problems of meaning, impact, and interaction. Journal of Institutional Economics 21, e1. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137424000249
  • Ionescu, A., Clipa, A., Turnea, E. et al. (2022). The impact of innovation framework conditions on corporate digital technology integration: Institutions as facilitators for sustainable digital transformation. Journal of Business Economics and Management 23(5), 1037–1059. DOI: 10.3846/jbem.2022.17039
  • Joskow, P. (2022). From hierarchies to markets and partially back again in electricity: responding to decarbonization and security of supply goals. Journal of Institutional Economics 18(2), 313–329. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137421000400
  • Kalinin, O., Gonchar, V., Abliazova, N. et al. (2024). Enhancing economic security through digital transformation in investment processes: Theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches integrating environmental sustainability. Natural and Engineering Sciences 9(1), 26–45. DOI: 10.28978/nesciences.1469858
  • Karieva, E., Akhmetshina, L., Fokina, O. (2021). Factors and conditions for the development of the digital economy in Russia. E3S Web of Conferences 244, 10025. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202124410025
  • Kira, B., Sinha, V., Srinivasan, S. (2021). Regulating digital ecosystems: bridging the gap between competition policy and data protection. Industrial and Corporate Change 30(5), 1337–1360. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtab053
  • Keum, D. (2025). The psychological design of firm boundaries: Preempting escalating commitment through buy vs. make. Academy of Management Journal 68(2), 436–463. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2022.0730
  • Korneeva, E., Strielkowski, W. (2023). The role of information and communication technologies in the institutional and economic sustainability of post-pandemic small and medium enterprises. Terra Economicus 21(1), 80–93. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-1-80-93
  • Larionova, M., Shelepov, A. (2021). Emerging regulation for the digital economy: Challenges and opportunities for multilateral global governance. International Organisations Research Journal 16(1), 29–63. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2021-01-02
  • Man, G., Zamfir, D., Diaconescu, D. et al. (2025). The role of digital technologies and intellectual property management in driving sustainable innovation. Sustainability 17(7), 3135. DOI: 10.3390/su17073135
  • Menard, C. (2022). Hybrids: where are we? Journal of Institutional Economics 18(2), 297–312. DOI: 10.1017/S1744137421000230
  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • North, D. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1), 97–112. DOI: 10.1257/jep.5.1.97
  • North, D. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review 84(3), 359–368.
  • North, D., Wallis, J. (1994). Integrating institutional change and technical change in economic history a transaction cost approach. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 150(4), 609–624.
  • Novikov, S., Sazonov, A. (2020). Digital economy development in Russia: main trends’ analysis and assessment. Revista Espacios 41(5), 26.
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rakotondrazaka, T., Velomasy, Y. (2024). Digital economy and poverty reduction in Africa: The role of governance quality. European Journal of Business and Management Research 9(4), 1–7. DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2024.9.4.2372
  • Romanyuk, M., Sukharnikova, M., Chekmareva, N. (2021). Trends of the digital economy development in Russia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 650(1), 012017. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/650/1/012017
  • Sanina, A., Balashov, A., Rubtcova, M. (2023). The socio-economic efficiency of digital government transformation. International Journal of Public Administration 46(1), 85–96. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2021.1988637
  • Santiso, C. (2022). Govtech against corruption: What are the integrity dividends of government digitalization? Data & Policy 4, e39. DOI: 10.1017/dap.2022.31
  • Shi, Y., Wei, F. (2025). Comparative analysis of digital economy-driven innovation development in China: An international perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 16, 4422–4464. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02128-z
  • Timofeyev, Y., Dremova, O. (2022). Insurers’ responses to cyber crime: Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 68, 100520. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2021.100520
  • Tu, X., Li, Z., Wu, M., Yan, R. (2023). Analysis on technical structure and competitiveness of ICT manufacturing industries. China Communications 20(3), 361–374. DOI: 10.23919/JCC.2023.03.024
  • Usman, M., Khan, N., Omri, A. (2024). Environmental policy stringency, ICT, and technological innovation for achieving sustainable development: Assessing the importance of governance and infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management 365, 121581. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121581
  • Villo, S., Turkina, N. (2023). How do Russian national systems of institutional absences shape insensitive corporate environmental violence of a Russian extractive multinational corporation? Journal of Business Ethics 185, 315–331. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05165-3
  • Volchik, V., Tsygankov, S., Fursa, E., Shiriaev, I., Maskaev, A. (2022). The institutions and mechanisms of the Russian innovation system’s regulation in the mirror of narratives. Journal of Economic Regulation 13(4), 6–23. DOI: 10.17835/2078-5429.2022.13.4.006-023
  • Volchik, V., Maslyukova, E., Strielkowski, W. (2023). Perception of scientific and social values in the sustainable development of national innovation systems. Social Sciences 12(4), 215. DOI: 10.3390/socsci12040215
  • Wallis, J. (2022). An alternative institutional approach to rules, organizations, and development. The Journal of Economic History 82(2), 335–367. DOI: 10.1017/S0022050722000122
  • Williamson, O. (1999). Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 20(12), 1087–1108. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199912)20:12<1087::AID-SMJ71>3.0.CO;2-Z
  • Williamson, O. (1985). Economic Institutions of Capitalism. N.Y.: The Free Press.
  • Williamson, O. (2010). Transaction cost economics: The natural progression. American Economic Review 100(3), 673–690. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.3.673
  • Yuan, H., Peng, G., Song, C., Wang, L., Lu, S. (2025). Enhancing digital economy: Optimizing export enterprise markup and resource allocation efficiency. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 16, 4185–4220. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-024-02142-1
  • Zhang, H., Millan, E., Money, K., Guo, P. (2025). E-commerce development, poverty reduction and income growth in rural China. Journal of Strategy and Management 18(1), 148–176. DOI: 10.1108/JSMA-06-2023-0148

Publisher: Southern Federal University
ISSN: 2073-6606